How has the COVID-19 disease affected patients with kidney stones?

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between the presence of kidney stones and COVID-19. Materials and methods: Patients, who were treated for COVID-19 as outpatients as well as inpatients in the ward and/or ICU of two different secondary and tertiary care centers between July 15, 2020, and December 31, 2020, and aged ≥18 years were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two subgroups based on the presence of kidney stones, and then the patients with kidney stone were categorized into three groups: those who were treated in an outpatient setting (Group 1), those who were treated in the ward (Group 2), and those who were treated in the intensive care unit (Group 3). Results: The total of 1,335 COVID-19 patients included in the study. Kidney stone was present in 31 (6.9%) of 450 outpatients, 41 (8.9%) of 460 inpatients treated in the ward, and 60 (14.1%) of 425 inpatients treated in the intensive care unit. In Group 1, the duration of COVID-19 treatment was significantly longer in patients with kidney stone than patients without kidney stone (8.1±1.7 vs. 6.8±2.2 days, p=0.01). In Group 2 and in Group 3, the mean hospitalization duration was significantly longer in patients with kidney stone than in those without kidney stone (9.1±3.7 vs. 6.2±2.1 days, p=0.007;19.1±8.1 vs. 11.3±6.2 days, p=0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The duration of COVID-19 treatment was longer and the COVID-19 infection was more severe in those with kidney stones. © 2022, Pamukkale University. All rights reserved.

Kidney stone detection using an optimized Deep Believe network by fractional coronavirus herd immunity optimizer

In this study, a computer-assisted kidney stone diagnosis system based on CT images has been proposed. The method is based on a combination of deep training and metaheuristics. The method aims to provide a customized Deep Believe Network (DBN) based on a fractional version of the coronavirus herd immunity enhancer to provide an efficient and reliable kidney stone diagnosis system. The designed method is then authenticated by running a standard benchmark called a "CT kidney dataset". Subsequently, a comparison is made between the results and some other state-of-the-art methods. Simulations show that the recommended DBN/FO-CHIO outperforms the other studied approaches in terms of efficiency with an accuracy of 97.98%. Moreover, the proposed DBN/FO-CHIO recall outperforms others with 92.99%, demonstrating its excellent accuracy compared to other comparison algorithms. Moreover, the higher specificity of the proposed method compared to the other evaluated approaches indicates its advanced event-independent value.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

An analysis of stone management over the decade before the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, France and England.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the implications that the rising upper urinary tract (UUT) stone prevalence in Europe and the increasing burden places on patients and healthcare providers (HCPs), we investigated the evolution of diagnoses and procedures in Germany, France and England over the decade before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We identified International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes related to UUT stones diagnosis and extracted procedure volumes for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy and open surgery using national procedure codes from the German Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System, the French Technical Agency of Hospitalisation Information and NHS England Hospital Episode Statistics. We analysed procedures vs hospital diagnoses from 2010 to 2019 and reported results per 100 000 inhabitants. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, ICD-10 N20 codes for calculus of kidney and ureter increased by 8%, 26% and 15% in Germany, France, and England respectively; whereas procedures increased by 3%, 38% and 18%. Of the patients diagnosed with stones, the percentage that received treatment (of any type) differed between countries. In 2019, in Germany 83% of patients diagnosed with stones received treatment, in France 88%, and in England 56%. These figures were relatively stable over the 10-year study period. Over the past decade, the dominant procedure shifted from ESWL to URS, and the average length of stay for URS decreased. Day case procedures increased in France and England (by 68% and 23%), no data were available in Germany. CONCLUSION: This analysis highlights an increase in stone diagnoses and procedures, and a shift of surgical management. This development may be due to clinical advantages and advanced technology. The continued stone prevalence rise affects patients, hospitals, and HCPs.

Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.

Both shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) are recommended as the first choice for non-lower pole kidney stones. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of SWL versus F-URS in patients with solitary non-lower pole kidney stones ≤ 20 mm under the COVID-19 pandemic. This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital from June 2020 to April 2022. Patients who underwent lithotripsy (SWL or F-URS) for non-lower pole kidney stones were enrolled in this study. The stone-free rate (SFR), retreatment rate, complications, and cost were recorded. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed. A total of 699 patients were finally included, of which 81.3% (568) were treated with SWL and 18.7% (131) underwent F-URS. After PSM, SWL showed equivalent SFR (87.9% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.323), retreatment rate (8.6% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.169), and adjunctive procedure (2.6% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.385) compared with F-URS. Complications were scarce and also comparable between SWL and F-URS (6.0% vs 7.7%, P > 0.05), while the incidence of ureteral perforation was higher in the F-URS group compared with the SWL group (1.5% vs 0%, P = 0.008). The hospital stay was significantly shorter (1 day vs 2 days, P < 0.001), and the cost was considerably less (1200 vs 30,083, P < 0.001) in the SWL group compared with the F-URS group. This prospective cohort demonstrated that SWL had equivalent efficacy with more safety and cost benefits than F-URS in treating patients with solitary non-lower pole kidney stones ≤ 20 mm. During the COVID-19 pandemic, SWL may have benefits in preserving hospital resources and limiting opportunity for virus transmission, compared to URS. These findings may guide clinical practice.

COVID-19 effect on perioperative findings of flexible/semi-rigid ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: A match-pair analysis.

PURPOSE: If not treated on time with proper management options, urolithiasis cause serious morphologic and functional alterations in the involved renal units. Like many other pathologies, the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up principles of patients with urinary stones have been negatively affected by the unestimated changes in the healthcare systems dealing intensively with COVID-19 patients. In this present study, we aimed to evaluate and present the possible effects of COVID-19 infection on the ureterorenoscopic stone treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and procedural characteristics of 96 patients undergoing flexible and/or rigid ureterorenoscopy because of urolithiasis between March 2020 and January 2021 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. Obtained data were evaluated after match-pair analysis in a comparative manner between cases with a positive medical history of COVID-19 infection (Group 1, n: 48) and those without any COVID-19 infection (Group 2, n: 48). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of cases with respect to age, gender, associated comorbidities, and stone characteristics (p > 0.05). The mean serum creatinine level was determined to be higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (1.15 ± 0.59 mg/dl, 0.83 ± 0.21 mg/dl, p = 0.007, respectively). Evaluation of the operative parameters revealed longer mean time from diagnosis to surgery (33.5 ± 14.27 vs 12.12 ± 6.33 days, p = 0.001), operating time, median length of stay in hospital along with higher additional intervention rates, and Clavien-Dindo complication scores again in Group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the presence of COVID-19 infection anamnesis may affect the clinical and operative parameters of ureteroscopic stone management in cases with urolithiasis due to the possible effects of renal units damage and longer waiting time. Urologists may be aware of these unestimated problems during and after the intervention to take necessary measures for a safe and successful ureteroscopic stone removal.

Dietary Assessment of Lithogenic Factors in Plant-Based Meat Products.

Introduction: Patients who form kidney stones are typically advised to limit intake of nondairy animal protein. Plant-based meat products may be a processed substitute protein source for these patients and have recently gained popularity because of health concerns, increased retail availability, decreased environmental impact, and meat supply shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these perceived benefits and tangential association with whole food plant-based diets, the potential lithogenic risks associated with these products are not well characterized. Methods: The U.S. Department of Agriculture database was queried with a sample of plant-based meat products widely available to U.S. consumers. Nutrient profile data were compiled and compared with animal protein data using standardized serving sizes. Primary protein sources were identified using verified ingredient lists. Oxalate content was extrapolated based on dietary data sources. Results: A total 47 plant-based meat products (16 beef, 11 pork, 10 chicken, and 10 seafood) were analyzed. Compared with their respective animal protein, most products contained on average fewer calories (plant-based beef 77%, pork 94%, chicken 86%, and seafood 83%) and less protein (plant-based beef 68%, pork 96%, chicken 53%, and seafood 54%). Most products used soy protein as the primary protein source (55%). Soy-based beef contained the highest average oxalate content (18 mg per serving), whereas soy-based seafood contained the lowest (7 mg). The most common non-soy protein source was pea protein (30%), containing trace amounts of oxalate. Sodium content was higher in most plant-based products overall (72%) and in each category (plant-based beef 109%, pork 128%, chicken 100%, and seafood 148%). Calcium content was higher (plant-based beef 317%, pork 144%, chicken 291%, and seafood 295%) compared with animal protein. Conclusions: Most plant-based meat products consist of protein sources that are, relative to animal protein sources, higher in oxalate, sodium, and calcium. Stone-forming patients should be counseled about the potential lithogenic risk of these processed products.

Should we support prophylactic intervention for asymptomatic kidney stones? A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing prophylactic intervention or active surveillance for asymptomatic kidney stones and identify factors influencing the outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with asymptomatic kidney stones in two institutes between November 2014 and November 2019. Standardized questions were asked via phone calls to supplement the outcomes. Pain, hydronephrosis, stone growth, serious infection, gross hematuria, and spontaneous passage were defined as stone-related events. Future intervention was also recorded to evaluate management. A total of 101 patients with 120 kidney units were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up time was 63 months. The patients were classified into the control group (79 cases) or exposure group (41 cases) according to whether they underwent prophylactic intervention before any stone-related events. Generally, the rates of stone-related events and future intervention were significantly different between the two groups (57.0 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001; and 31.6 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.002, respectively). After applying stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted, Cox regression suggested that patients who underwent prophylactic intervention were less likely to experience stone-related events and future intervention (HR = 0.175, and HR = 0.028, respectively). In conclusion, patients who underwent prophylactic intervention had a lower risk of stone-related events and future intervention, although they had some slight complications.

Acute Bacterial Hemorrhagic Pyelonephritis in a COVID-19 Patient With a History of Hypothyroidism: A Case Report.

Since its initial reporting in December 2019, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as a global health problem after its official declaration as a pandemic by the World Health Organization, with an estimated 346 million cases and over 5.9 million fatalities as of January 22, 2022. Studies on the prevalence of COVID-19 among severe cases have shown that comorbidities and risk factors such as obesity, increased aging, and chronic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases play a role in the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. The interactions between such factors and their involvement with the progression of infection and mortality remain unclear. While it is known that SARS-CoV-2 damages the lungs, various morbidities such as acute kidney disease and thyroid dysregulation have recently emerged in symptomatic COVID-19 patients. Conditions that alter thyroid hormones, which play a critical role in regulating metabolic pathways, have a role in the level of infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2. The capability of the SARS-CoV-2 to invade and affect any organ system is dependent on its access to the angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) commonly expressed among various host cells. This binding puts any system at high risk of direct viral injury, inevitably creating an excessively high concentration of anti-inflammatory mediators and cytokines to predispose COVID-19 patients to a state of severe immunosuppression. This case report describes a 62-year-old female who tested positive for COVID-19, with a medical history of hypothyroidism, who presented with a unique combination of acute bacterial hemorrhagic pyelonephritis and ureteral obstruction. She experienced intermittent dysuria, urinary urgency, and hematuria over the past five days. She developed chills, diaphoresis, nausea, and vomiting after administering acetaminophen for her headache. Ageusia and anosmia accompanied her respiratory illnesses despite receiving the Pfizer double dose vaccine six months before her arrival. A computerized tomography (CT) scan revealed severe to moderate inflammation surrounding the enlarged kidney with a 1 mm ureteral stone. Blood and urine cultures showed the growth of Escherichia  coli gram-negative bacilli. Chest X-rays displayed a patchy appearance in the right infrahilar airspace, reflecting atelectasis in part for the diagnosis of COVID-19 with additional laboratory findings of profoundly elevated C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and d-dimer levels. Abdominal CT scans revealed a hemorrhagic ureteral obstruction and massive swelling of the renal parenchyma persistent to pyelonephritis and hydronephrosis.

Effects of COVID-19 pandemics on urinary metabolites in kidney stone patients: our kidney stone prevention clinic experience.

BACKGROUND: The dietary habits and lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic could affect the urinary risk factors in kidney stone formers. In this study, we investigated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on 24-h urine metabolites, as a surrogate for dietary intake, in patients with kidney stones, in Tehran, Iran. METHODS: We evaluated the medical records of all patients with urolithiasis who visited in our stone prevention clinic from the beginning of COVID-19 in Iran to 1 year later (Feb 2020-Feb 2021) and compared it with the patients' medical records in the same period a year before COVID-19 (Feb 2019-Feb 2020). RESULTS: The results of our stone prevention clinic showed a decrease in the number of visits during COVID-19. Twenty-four-hour urine urea, sodium, and potassium were significantly lower, and 24-h urine magnesium was significantly higher during COVID-19. Higher 24-h urine oxalate was only shown in patients with the first-time visit, whereas lower 24-h urine uric acid and citrate were only shown in patients with the follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 pandemics may change some of the dietary habits of the patients, including lower salt, protein, and fruit and vegetable intake. Although economic issues, restricted access, or sanitation issues may be the reason for the undesirable dietary changes, the importance of a quality diet should be discussed with all patients, as possible. Since the number of patients visited in the stone clinic was lower during COVID-19, virtual visits could be an excellent alternative to motivate patients with kidney stones.